ArticleJournal of Intelligence2026
Exploring Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers' Diagnostic Thinking During AI-Supported Task Design: A Configurational Mixed-Methods Pilot Study.
Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Developing pre-service mathematics teachers' ability to understand students' mathematical thinking and anticipate students' difficulties remains a challenge in teacher education. This exploratory mixed-methods study involved 21 pre-service mathematics teachers in a six-week AI-supported mathematical task design module. The study combined pre-post assessment, fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA), and qualitative analysis of participants' AI interactions and reflections. The key findings were as follows: (1) Participants showed significantly higher post-test scores in overall diagnostic thinking and in perception, interpretation, and judgement than at pre-test. (2) The configurational analysis identified a comparatively stable pattern associated with high post-intervention diagnostic thinking, combining lower initial diagnostic thinking with high AI acceptance and high prompting knowledge density. (3) Qualitative evidence further showed that AI served as an interactive resource for exploring mathematical and pedagogical considerations, evaluating generated suggestions, and revising task designs. Exploratory comparisons suggested that AI use could range from broader knowledge-oriented support to more selective verification and refinement. The findings highlight the heterogeneous nature of AI-supported professional learning and underscore the importance of critical evaluation and professional agency in teacher-AI collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.