ArticleJournal of Intelligence2026
Real-Time Dynamic Adaptive Test Assembly for Personalized Measurement of Cognitive Abilities Under Continuous Item Bank Growth.
Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accurate measurement of individual cognitive abilities in educational settings increasingly relies on personalized assessment systems that adapt to the learner's current standing on the measured ability. These systems generate and use assessment items continuously and in real-time, bypassing the field-test cycle that traditional calibration requires. Item banks therefore contain a growing share of items whose parameters must be predicted first, and each test form must be assembled in real time to match the learner's current ability level and content needs for effective personalized instruction. This study proposes an Ising framework that addresses both requirements by predicting item parameters from text with calibrated uncertainty estimates and assembling personalized test forms within the time budget of the assessment loop. This framework is validated through a factorial simulation and an empirical study on state-level English Language Arts items across Grades 3 through 12. In the simulation, the proposed uncertainty-aware method achieves a mean test information function (TIF) gap of 0.226, compared with 1.171 for the conventional baseline that ignores prediction uncertainty. The proposed method also produces feasible forms across the full operational region, whereas the chance-constrained and robust baselines become infeasible at high prediction error combined with a high share of predicted items. In the empirical study, predictive intervals achieve coverage within ten percentage points of the nominal level in the pooled condition, and the uncertainty-aware assembly reduces the TIF gap relative to the baseline, with the largest gains at the extremes of the ability distribution where accurate measurement matters most for instructional placement decisions. By separating prediction uncertainty from true individual differences in ability, this framework preserves the interpretability of cognitive ability estimates and provides a foundation for personalized assessment systems that support differentiated instruction under continuous item bank growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.