ArticleJournal of Intelligence2026
Comparing Human Ability with Generative AI: Self-Evaluation, Appraisal, and Adaptive Professional Intelligence Among Journalism and Communication Students.
Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping how students evaluate their abilities, occupational prospects, and the continuing value of professional education. This study examined how ability-based comparison with AI is associated with perceived professional value among journalism and communication students and why the same comparison may be linked to both threatening and adaptive responses. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was used. Survey data from 507 students in China were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling, with PROCESS analyses as robustness checks, followed by semi-structured interviews with 20 students. Ability-based comparison with AI was positively associated with job replacement anxiety, which was negatively associated with perceived professional value, and with AI learning motivation, which was positively associated with perceived professional value. A positive direct association with perceived professional value also remained. AI hindrance appraisal strengthened the comparison-anxiety association, whereas AI challenge appraisal did not significantly moderate the comparison-motivation association. Interviews indicated that these relationships were task- and criterion-dependent and shaped by occupational interpretation and concrete learning demands. Human-AI comparison may therefore relate to professional value through simultaneous threat- and adaptation-oriented pathways rather than a uniformly positive or negative process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.