Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42783528›Full record

ArticleMembranes2026

Second-Pass Vessel Arrangement and Separation-Limited Operation in Two-Pass Seawater Reverse Osmosis Under Progressive Fouling: Implications for Electrolytic Hydrogen Production.

Tomas Rojas, Pablo Cassorla, Adrian Rojas, Gonzalo Aguila

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Membranes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tomas RojasDepartment of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Santiago 8940897, Chile.
Pablo CassorlaRemote Waters SpA, Santiago 7860340, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-3097-0417
Adrian RojasTechnology Center for Packaging Innovation (LABEN-CHILE), Department of Science and Food Technology, Faculty of Technology, University of Santiago of Chile (USACH), Santiago 9170201, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-9253-1295
Gonzalo AguilaIndependent Researcher, Santiago 7810803, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-3441-4175

Funding

National Agency for Research and Development ANID/ATE230035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) supplies the purification chain of electrolytic hydrogen plants, yet its long-term behaviour under fouling is rarely resolved at train level. This work presents a dynamic, quasi-steady-state model of a two-pass SWRO train and compares three second-pass architectures under progressive first-pass fouling, represented by time-evolving water- and solute-permeability coefficients. At each of 51 instants over a 500-day horizon, the operating point is re-optimized to minimize specific energy consumption (SEC), subject to a product limit of 20 mg·L

Indexed as

energy recovery devicemembrane foulingpressure vessel arrangementprocess modellingseawater reverse osmosisspecific energy consumptiontwo-pass configurationwater electrolysis

Identifiers

PMID42783528
PMCPMC13608914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.