ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2026
Personalizing Peri-Intubation Oxygenation in Patients at Risk of Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: A Phenotype-Driven Narrative Review of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen and Non-Invasive Ventilation.
Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tracheal intubation in patients at risk of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) carries a high risk of life-threatening desaturation, and the choice of peri-intubation oxygenation strategy critically influences patient safety. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on non-invasive oxygenation techniques-high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO), non-invasive ventilation (NIV), and their combination-across the pre-oxygenation, apneic, and awake-intubation phases of airway management. We examine the physiological mechanisms underlying each modality, appraise landmark randomized trials and meta-analyses (including PREOXI, OPTINIV, and OPTIMASK), and address disease-specific considerations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, interstitial lung disease, severe obesity, obstructive sleep apnea, and obstetric, pediatric, and trauma populations. The evidence supports a phenotype-driven hierarchy rather than a single dominant technique: NIV-optionally combined with HFNO for apneic oxygenation-is preferred in severely hypoxemic critically ill patients, whereas HFNO alone is adequate for many moderately hypoxemic or non-hypoxemic patients. Progressive hypercapnia limits apneic oxygenation, particularly in chronic CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.