ArticleMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Nasoalveolar Molding and Feeding in Infants with Cleft Lip and Palate: An Exploratory Study of Parents' and Caregivers' Perceived Experiences.
Article in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesPatients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) typically experience feeding difficulties due to an abnormal communication between the oral and nasal cavities, and novel therapies such as palate tissue engineering and nasoalveolar molding (NAM) are in need to improve the final outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the parents and caregivers perceptions on the potential of NAM to improve feeding in patients with CLP.
methods42 infants with unilateral or bilateral CLP treated with NAM at a reference craniofacial unit were included in the study. Parents or caregivers completed a four-item questionnaire at 3 months of age, before cheiloplasty, evaluating the effects of NAM to improve nasal regurgitation, choking, air swallowing, and feeding time using a 4-point Likert scale. A total perceived feeding benefit score (range 4-16) was calculated.
resultsParents and caregivers perceived a positive effect of NAM to improve choking (3.67 ± 0.53), nasal regurgitation (3.62 ± 0.58), and feeding time (3.50 ± 0.67), while air swallowing showed lower scores (3.19 ± 0.55). The total perceived feeding benefit score was 13.98 ± 1.57, indicating a high perceived benefit. No significant differences were found between males and females or between unilateral and bilateral clefts.
conclusionsParents and caregivers consistently perceived a beneficial effect of NAM on patients' feeding. Although further research is required to determine the actual effectiveness of NAM, examining the perspectives reported by parents and caregivers could contribute to understand treatment experiences and guide family-centered care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.