ReviewMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Non-HLA Antibodies in Kidney Transplantation: Mediators of Allograft Injury or Markers of Dysregulated Humoral Immunity?
Review in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) remains a major cause of kidney allograft injury and loss. Although donor-specific antibodies against human leukocyte antigens (HLA-DSAs) are central to humoral alloimmunity, they do not explain all cases of microvascular inflammation or graft dysfunction. This review critically evaluates non-HLA antibodies as potential mediators of allograft injury and markers of dysregulated humoral immunity by integrating functional, experimental, clinicopathological, and clinical evidence. Receptor-targeting antibodies, especially those against the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) and the endothelin-1 type A receptor (ETAR), have the strongest evidence for direct pathogenicity. Antibodies against major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain A (MICA) and glutathione S-transferase theta-1 (GSTT1) reflect non-HLA alloimmunity, whereas antibodies targeting perlecan-derived LG3, vimentin, and injury-associated antigens may arise through secondary autoimmunity and mark broader humoral activation. We propose that selected pathogenic non-HLA antibodies participate in a feed-forward cycle of graft injury, antigen exposure, epitope spreading, and humoral amplification, although this model requires longitudinal validation. Crucially, non-HLA antibody positivity alone should neither establish AMR nor guide antibody-specific treatment. Its interpretation should be target-specific and integrated with HLA-DSAs, histopathology, molecular findings, graft function, and evidence of immune activation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.