ReviewMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Point-of-Care Assessment of Kidney Function in Chronic Kidney Disease: Current Technologies and Future Perspectives.
Review in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) requires assessment of both glomerular filtration and kidney damage, particularly albuminuria, for diagnosis, risk stratification, and longitudinal care. Point-of-care testing (POCT) can shorten turnaround time and improve access when conventional laboratory testing is unavailable or would delay a clinical pathway. This narrative review summarizes established and emerging POCT approaches for kidney assessment in CKD, with emphasis on creatinine/eGFR and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), and distinguishes analytical validity from workflow utility and patient-level clinical utility. Evidence is strongest for rapid creatinine measurement in selected workflows, especially pre-imaging assessment and decentralized screening, while quantitative/semiquantitative UACR POCT can support CKD detection when abnormal results are appropriately confirmed. Cystatin C microfluidic systems remain investigational, and kidney injury/stress or molecular biomarkers such as NGAL, KIM-1, L-FABP, [TIMP-2]·[IGFBP7], extracellular vesicles, and microRNAs should be regarded primarily as a research horizon rather than direct measures of GFR. Important implementation requirements include assay-specific validation, calibration traceability, quality assurance, recognition of biological and analytical interference, and confirmation of results near major clinical decision thresholds. Evidence that POCT improves long-term CKD outcomes, safety, adherence, or cost-effectiveness remains limited. Future studies should prioritize prospective clinical utility, implementation, cost-effectiveness, home-use validation, and patient-centered outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.