ReviewMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Extracellular Vesicles at the Interface of Cancer Therapy and Regenerative Medicine: Biology, Bidirectional Roles, and Engineered Therapeutics.
Review in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs), including exosomes and microvesicles, are nanoscale membrane-enclosed particles that transfer proteins, lipids, mRNAs, and microRNAs between cells. The same communication system is now being developed in two apparently opposing settings: mesenchymal stem/stromal cell (MSC)-derived EVs are explored as cell-free regenerative therapeutics, whereas tumor-derived EVs can promote metastasis, immune evasion, and treatment resistance while also serving as liquid-biopsy biomarkers. Rather than treating these studies separately, this review compares them along shared mechanistic axes: producer-cell identity and state, luminal cargo, membrane and surface composition (including the biomolecular corona), dose and administration route, biodistribution, and recipient-cell context. This cross-field perspective shows that angiogenesis, immunomodulation, matrix remodeling, and tissue tropism are not intrinsically regenerative or oncogenic; their consequences depend on where, how, and to which cells EV signals are delivered. We review EV biology and MISEV2023-aligned nomenclature, examine bidirectional regenerative and cancer-associated functions, and survey engineering strategies for cargo loading and surface modification together with plant-derived exosome-like nanovesicles. We further compare EVs with lipid nanoparticles, adeno-associated viruses, polymers, and virus-like particles, and discuss how engineering can improve potency and targeting while increasing manufacturing and characterization complexity. Finally, we address tumor-related safety considerations for regenerative EVs and the unresolved biological, technical, manufacturing, and regulatory questions that must be addressed for clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.