ReviewBiosensors2026
Artificial Intelligence in Electrochemical Sensing: A Network Evidence Map of Translational Barriers and Pathways to Point-of-Care Deployment.
Review in Biosensors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) with electrochemical sensing has revolutionized analytical diagnostics by overcoming traditional limitations such as signal drift, peak overlapping, and matrix interference. However, despite the exponential growth of this field, a unified framework evaluating translational feasibility remains absent. This review critically analyzes AI/ML architectures applied to electrochemical sensors and biosensors from 2016 to 2025. To the best of our knowledge, this work introduces the first coded Network Evidence Map to quantitatively map the co-occurrence of methodological strengths, weaknesses, and translational barriers across the examined literature. The analysis reveals that while deep learning and ensemble models excel in signal deconvolution and multiplexing, the field is severely constrained by systemic bottlenecks. Network pathways demonstrate that over 83% of studies lack uncertainty quantification, and data scarcity coupled with restricted data-sharing policies critically undermines model reproducibility. Furthermore, batch-to-batch hardware variability measurably co-occurs with the opacity of black-box algorithms, hindering regulatory approval. We conclude that advancing from laboratory proof-of-concept to real-world point-of-care deployment necessitates a paradigm shift toward open-source electrochemical repositories, explainable AI (XAI), physics-informed machine learning, and hardware-software co-design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.