ArticleEuropean journal of investigation in health, psychology and education2026
Classroom Social Climate and Resilience in Secondary Education Students.
Article in European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Classroom social climate has become a factor of increasing interest within the educational field due to its potential influence on students' well-being and adjustment. The present study focused on analysing the relationship between the different dimensions of classroom social climate and school resilience in a sample of 609 Spanish secondary education students aged between 11 and 17 years. The Classroom Social Climate Scale (CSC) and the School Resilience Scale (SRS) were used as data collection instruments. The data were analysed using correlations and linear regressions to examine associations while retaining the continuous nature of the resilience scores, complemented by multinomial logistic regressions to examine the probability of belonging to relatively low, medium, or high resilience resource groups. The results showed positive and significant associations between the dimensions Relationship, Interest and Communication with Teachers (RIC) and Group Cohesion and Satisfaction (GCS), and both the Internal Resources and External Resources dimensions of resilience. Linear regression models explained 17.2% and 18.0% of the variance in Internal and External Resources, respectively, whereas multinomial logistic regression models yielded Nagelkerke R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.