Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42783034›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2026

Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: Pathophysiology, Clinical Phenotypes, and Mechanism-Guided Diagnostic Strategies.

Divyansh Sharma, Daniel Bishev, Shudipan Chakraborty, Michael V DiCaro, Ryan Shao, KiBuom Lee, KaChon Lei, Omar Shah, Sanjay Malhotra, Chowdhury Ahsan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Divyansh SharmaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89106, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-8966-4189
Daniel BishevDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89106, USA.
Shudipan ChakrabortyDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89106, USA.
Michael V DiCaroDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89106, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3376-4608
Ryan ShaoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89106, USA.
KiBuom LeeDepartment of Cardiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
KaChon LeiDepartment of Cardiology, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3696-195X
Omar ShahNew York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Sanjay MalhotraDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89106, USA.
Chowdhury AhsanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89106, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a prevalent and clinically important cause of myocardial ischemia across the spectrum of coronary artery disease, including patients with angina and nonobstructive coronary arteries, persistent symptoms after revascularization, and acute coronary syndromes. Despite its prognostic significance, CMD remains underrecognized due to the limitations of angiography-centered evaluation and the heterogeneity of underlying biological mechanisms. This review presents a physiology-based framework for the assessment of CMD, emphasizing the role of invasive coronary function testing in defining mechanistic endotypes and informing clinical interpretation. We summarize the biological foundations of CMD, including endothelial dysfunction, vascular smooth muscle hyperreactivity, structural remodeling of the microcirculation, and extravascular myocardial influences, and describe how these processes manifest as distinct but overlapping clinical phenotypes. Contemporary invasive physiologic tools-coronary flow reserve, index of microcirculatory resistance, and vasomotor testing with acetylcholine-are reviewed with a focus on their complementary roles in localizing disease within the coronary circulation. The clinical application of microvascular testing is discussed in both stable coronary syndromes and acute coronary syndromes, highlighting differences in diagnostic intent, prognostic implications, and therapeutic relevance. We distinguish chronic CMD in stable syndromes from post-myocardial infarction microvascular injury, in which invasive indices have primarily prognostic implications. By integrating coronary biology, invasive physiology, and clinical context, this review supports a shift from purely anatomic assessment toward a mechanism-based, physiology-driven approach to ischemic heart disease.

Indexed as

acetylcholine testingacute coronary syndromescoronary flow reservecoronary microvascular dysfunctionindex of microcirculatory resistanceinvasive coronary physiologyischemia with no obstructive coronary arteriesmicrovascular anginastable coronary artery diseasevasomotor dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID42783034
PMCPMC13607091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.