ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2026
First-Trimester Assessment of the Extended Fetal Cardiovascular System Using the CASSEAL 3 × 3 Framework: Feasibility, Reproducibility and Diagnostic Performance.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Extended Fetal Cardiovascular System (EFCS) encompasses the cardiac, infracardiac, and supracardiac vascular territories that contribute to fetal cardiovascular development and function. The CASSEAL 3 × 3 framework was developed to provide a structured anatomical assessment of the EFCS. This study aimed to evaluate its feasibility, reproducibility, and diagnostic performance during first-trimester screening.
methodsIn this prospective single-center study, singleton pregnancies undergoing ultrasound examination between 11 + 0 and 13 + 6 weeks of gestation were assessed using the CASSEAL 3 × 3 framework. Feasibility, examination time, use of complementary techniques, interobserver reproducibility, and diagnostic performance were evaluated. Prenatal follow-up and postnatal findings served as the reference standard.
resultsA total of 288 pregnancies were included in the final analysis. Complete visualization of all nine axial views was achieved in 86.5% of examinations. Mean examination time was 12.5 ± 3.3 min. Higher gestational age increased the likelihood of complete visualization, whereas higher maternal body mass index reduced feasibility. Interobserver agreement was high, with no significant systematic differences between operators. Six suspected EFCS abnormalities were identified during first-trimester examination. Diagnostic performance demonstrated high specificity (99.64%) and negative predictive value (98.58%), whereas sensitivity was moderate and should be interpreted cautiously due to the limited number of confirmed abnormalities.
conclusionsThe CASSEAL 3 × 3 framework is a feasible and reproducible approach for structured first-trimester assessment of the EFCS. Diagnostic performance estimates should be interpreted cautiously given the limited number and spectrum of confirmed abnormalities and the use of a composite reference standard without systematic postnatal echocardiography. The framework may be better suited to specialized fetal medicine settings or as an adjunct to routine first-trimester assessment rather than as a universal screening tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.