ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2026
Sex Differences in Outcomes After Type A Acute Aortic Dissection: An Analysis of the UK National Adult Cardiac Surgery Audit Registry.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: Type A acute aortic dissection (TAAAD) predominantly affects men, yet conflicting evidence persists regarding sex- and socioeconomic-related differences in outcomes. We evaluated these differences using a large national UK registry. (2) Methods: Patients undergoing TAAAD repair between 1996 and 2019 were identified from the National Adult Cardiac Surgery Audit (NACSA) and stratified by sex and socioeconomic status. In-hospital outcomes were compared and inverse probability weighting was applied to adjust for imbalances between groups and estimate the average treatment effect (ATE) of female versus male. (3) Results: A total of 2857 patients underwent TAAAD repair, including 1907 (67%) men and 950 (33%) women. Women were older and had lower BMI, while men more frequently presented with bicuspid aortic valve and aortic root aneurysm. The rates of aortic root replacement and total arch replacement were comparable between sexes, as was the median circulatory arrest time. No significant differences were observed in socioeconomic deprivation indices. In-hospital mortality (18.7% in men vs. 19% in women), cerebrovascular accident (12.5% vs. 12.5%), dialysis (14.5% vs. 14.6%), and length of stay (13 vs. 13 days) were comparable between sexes. After inverse probability weighting, female sex was not independently associated with in-hospital mortality or post-operative complications. (4) Conclusions: In this large UK registry, female sex was not independently associated with worse in-hospital outcomes after TAAAD repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.