ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2026
Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Dilated Left Ventricular Non-Compaction Versus Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Propensity Score Matching Study.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The long-term prognosis of left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) compared to dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) remains inconclusive, as prior studies have frequently failed to adequately adjust for heart failure severity. We conducted a single-center, retrospective, comparative study enrolling 96 patients with dilated LVNC (dLVNC) and 437 patients with DCM diagnosed at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between January 2010 and December 2022. dLVNC was defined as meeting the Jenni criteria, with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤45% and increased left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD). A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed, with matching variables including sex, age, history of heart failure (HF) hospitalization, arrhythmia, LVEF, and LVEDD, resulting in 96 matched pairs. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), comprising cardiovascular death or heart transplantation, HF hospitalization or cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation, severe arrhythmias, and systemic embolism. After a median follow-up of 5.46 (2.14-8.62) years in the dLVNC group and 5.26 (2.47-8.50) years in the DCM group, the Kaplan-Meier survival curves between the groups were highly overlapping and revealed no significant differences in MACEs (log-rank
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.