ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026
Practical Insights from Operationalizing a Remote Symptom Monitoring Program Using a Commercial Platform in a Canadian Community Cancer Clinic: A Post-Implementation Qualitative Evaluation.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Remote symptom monitoring using electronic patient-reported outcomes reduces symptom burden and acute care use in oncology, but most programs have been established in academic centers or funded trials using purpose-built software. We examined how the REmote Symptom and Patient mONitoring System (RESPONSe) was implemented and subsequently funded as a recurrent clinical service at a Canadian community cancer clinic using a configured commercial platform, patients' own devices, and no formal institutional mandate. We conducted a qualitative post-implementation process evaluation at Richmond Cancer Clinic, British Columbia, reported following the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research. Eight staff, purposively sampled by role and phase of involvement, were invited and participated, which consisted of one oncologist, three nurses, two virtual health staff, and two administrators. Interviews were analyzed using deductive-inductive thematic analysis. Three themes were identified: tailoring technology for clinical fit; designing care around patient and clinician users, centered on a dedicated symptom management nurse; and managing up towards operationalization. Operationalization was achievable using a customizable commercial platform, but depended on the interaction of iterative technology adaptation, dedicated clinical ownership, evolving care workflows, and sustained organizational advocacy. We propose five transferable implementation strategies mapped to established implementation frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.