Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42782896›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026

Beyond Chronological Age: A Scoping Review of Neurosurgical Intervention for Central Nervous System Tumors in the Very Elderly.

Jacob Gould, Sarah Segal, Garin G Griffith, Saud K Zaidan, Saarang Patel, Arjit Singh, Hazem S Ghaith, Julian Gendreau

Abstract readScoping ReviewReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jacob GouldDepartment of Neurological Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Sarah SegalDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Garin G GriffithDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-9761-2659
Saud K ZaidanDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5466-772X
Saarang PatelDepartment of Biological Sciences, Seton Hall University, South Orange, NJ 07079, USA.
Arjit SinghDepartment of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Hazem S GhaithDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9519-851X
Julian GendreauDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adults aged 75 years or older are increasingly considered for neurosurgical treatment of primary central nervous system tumors, yet the evidence guiding treatment selection remains fragmented. We conducted a scoping review of PubMed/MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science from database inception through July 2026. Original clinical reports were eligible when they included separately extractable data for adults aged 75 years or older undergoing or being evaluated for tumor-directed neurosurgical intervention for primary intracranial, skull-base, cranial-nerve, spinal cord, meningeal, or primary vertebral tumors. Data were charted using a standardized framework and synthesized descriptively by tumor type, treatment intent, patient-selection factors, and reported outcomes. Eighty reports were included, of which 37 addressed glioma or glioblastoma and 25 addressed intracranial meningioma; 75 were retrospective. In glioma, greater resection was frequently associated with longer survival, although findings for subtotal resection were inconsistent and postoperative treatment completion was an important prognostic factor. In meningioma, functional preservation and independence were prominent considerations, while sellar, spinal, and vestibular schwannoma studies emphasized vision, neurologic function, and cranial-nerve outcomes. Quality of life, cognition, caregiver burden, and time at home were rarely reported. Surgical benefit in very elderly patients is tumor-specific, and future studies should prioritize prospective, patient-centered outcomes rather than relying primarily on survival or chronological age.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System NeoplasmsNeurosurgical ProceduresAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMalebrain tumorfrailtygeriatric oncologyneuro-oncologyspinal tumorsurgical outcomes

Identifiers

PMID42782896
PMCPMC13605894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.