ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026
Management of Advanced Solid Tumors Recurring After Adjuvant Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Structured Narrative Review.
Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adjuvant and perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have created a growing population of patients who relapse after prior programmed death-1 or programmed death-ligand 1 blockade, yet these patients were underrepresented in many trials that established metastatic standards. We performed a structured narrative review of PubMed/MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, reference lists, and international oncology guideline repositories through 15 August 2026. Eligible reports addressed recurrence patterns or treatment after curative-intent ICI in melanoma, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), renal cell carcinoma (RCC), urothelial carcinoma, or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC); landmark metastatic studies were included only when direct evidence was unavailable and are labeled as extrapolation. Timing was standardized as on-treatment recurrence, early off-treatment recurrence (after the last ICI dose through 12 months), and late recurrence (>12 months). Shorter disease-free interval is consistently prognostic, but treatment-by-timing interactions are rarely available; timing should not be described as a validated pan-tumor predictive biomarker. Direct post-adjuvant evidence supports switching away from anti-PD-1 monotherapy for melanoma recurring on treatment, while selected late relapses may retain sensitivity. In RCC, retrospective post-adjuvant data support VEGF-targeted options, whereas CONTACT-03 and TiNivo-2 discourage routine ICI-TKI rechallenge specifically after prior ICI-treated metastatic RCC. Evidence in NSCLC, urothelial carcinoma, and TNBC is largely indirect. IMpassion132 was not an ICI-rechallenge trial, and only a small minority of ASCENT-04 participants had prior perioperative ICI. Treatment should integrate tumor-specific biology, actionable alterations, recurrence distribution, prior toxicity, comorbidity, access, and patient preference. Prospective trials dedicated to post-adjuvant ICI recurrence are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.