ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026
Initial Experience with MR-Guided or CT-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report early toxicity outcomes after institutional implementation of prostate SBRT using 42.7 Gy in seven fractions delivered with either MR-guided adaptive SBRT (MRgSBRT) or CT-guided non-adaptive SBRT (CTgSBRT). Between July 2019 and May 2023, 216 patients received this regimen. Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were retrospectively assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Most patients had intermediate-risk disease (86%), and 14% had high-risk disease. Median prostate volume was 40 mL, and median baseline International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was 8 among patients with available data. MRgSBRT and CTgSBRT were used in 100 (46%) and 116 (54%) patients, respectively. At a median follow-up of 19 months, 12- and 24-month grade ≥ 2 GU toxicity rates were 20.0% and 18.2%, while grade ≥ 2 GI toxicity rates were 3.5% and 3.6%, respectively. No statistically significant platform-related differences were detected; however, these comparisons were exploratory and potentially confounded by nonrandomized platform selection, treatment era, rectal-spacer use, adaptive workflow and differing PTV margins. On univariable analysis, baseline GU symptoms were associated with higher 12-month grade ≥ 2 GU toxicity (OR, 3.68; 95% CI, 1.52-10.37;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.