ReviewDermatopathology (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Scalp Biopsies for Alopecia.
Review in Dermatopathology (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHair loss is one of the most common reasons patients seek dermatologic evaluation. Although clinical examination and trichoscopy establish the diagnosis in most cases, scalp biopsy remains essential when findings are inconclusive, when cicatricial alopecia is suspected, or when histopathologic documentation is required before systemic therapy.
methodsThis narrative review synthesizes evidence from PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase on the indications, biopsy site selection, sampling technique, specimen processing, and histopathologic interpretation of scalp biopsy in alopecia.
resultsDiagnostic yield depends on appropriate patient selection, trichoscopy-guided site selection, meticulous sampling, and optimal processing. A 4-mm punch oriented parallel to the hair shafts and extending into the subcutaneous fat, combined with horizontal and vertical sectioning (HoVert or Tyler technique), allows the most comprehensive assessment of follicular architecture. Histopathology reliably separates scarring from nonscarring alopecia and, in cicatricial forms, classifies disease by the predominant inflammatory infiltrate following the NAHRS scheme. Ancillary studies, including direct immunofluorescence, periodic acid-Schiff staining, elastic fiber stains, and microbiologic cultures, are applied selectively when clinically indicated.
conclusionsIntegrating clinical, trichoscopic, and histopathologic findings improves diagnostic accuracy and guides therapeutic decisions. Close collaboration between the dermatologist and dermatopathologist maximizes the diagnostic value of scalp biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.