Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42782839›Full record

ReviewDermatopathology (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Basic Principles of Skin Biopsy Optimization in Dermatopathology.

Mar Llamas-Velasco, Eduardo Rozas-Muñoz, Angel Fernandez-Flores, Maria-Teresa Fernandez-Figueras

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dermatopathology (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mar Llamas-VelascoDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital de la Princesa, 28006 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1187-1341
Eduardo Rozas-MuñozDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital San Pablo, Coquimbo 1781881, Chile.
Angel Fernandez-FloresDepartment of Cellular Pathology, Hospital Universitario El Bierzo, 24404 Ponferrada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6617-2364
Maria-Teresa Fernandez-FiguerasDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Hospital Universitari General de Catalunya, Grupo Quironsalud, Sant Cugat del Vallés, 08195 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2366-7110

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin biopsy is one of the most valuable diagnostic procedures in dermatology, particularly when clinical findings alone are insufficient to establish a diagnosis. However, obtaining an accurate histopathological diagnosis depends on multiple steps, and errors at any stage of the biopsy pathway may compromise the final result. This review synthesizes current evidence and available guidelines on best practices for skin biopsy, integrating the practical experience of four internationally recognized dermatopathologists to address areas where evidence is limited or poorly standardized. The review covers biopsy planning, selection of the optimal biopsy site and technique, specimen handling and fixation, grossing and laboratory processing, prevention of technical artifacts, the use of ancillary diagnostic techniques, and clinicopathological correlation, with particular attention to challenging anatomical sites and complex diseases. Diagnostic accuracy depends on obtaining a representative specimen, maintaining high technical standards throughout tissue processing, providing adequate clinical information, and ensuring close communication between the clinician and the dermatopathologist. In selected cases, multidisciplinary review is required to reach a definitive diagnosis. Adherence to these principles can optimize diagnostic yield, reduce avoidable errors, and ultimately improve patient care.

Indexed as

biopsy techniqueclinicopathological correlationdermatopathologydiagnostic accuracyhistopathologypitfallspre-analyticalqualityskin biopsyspecimen handling

Identifiers

PMID42782839
PMCPMC13605635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.