ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Bio-Inspired Physiological-Behavioral Fusion Method for Human-Factor Risk Assessment of Imported Unmanned Intelligent System Operators in Port-Security Scenarios.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Operator fatigue, stress, delayed response, and abnormal operation may compromise the safety of unmanned intelligent system operation in port-security scenarios. This study proposes a bio-inspired engineering architecture for physiological-behavioral fusion risk assessment of operators. The architecture is motivated by homeostatic regulation, coordinated physiological-behavioral responses, selective attention, and feedback concepts; it does not aim to reproduce a biological or neural mechanism. It combines operator-specific baseline calibration, physiological and behavioral feature representation, cross-modal coupling representation, modality-level adaptive weighting, and temporal risk-state classification to identify normal, fatigue, stress, and abnormal-operation states. Physiological information was acquired using a non-invasive smart-cushion sensing system and supplementary electrodermal-activity monitoring, while behavioral information was derived from operation-platform and task-event logs. The proposed method was evaluated under representative port-operation tasks using a participant-level data split and repeated computational training-and-evaluation runs. These repeated runs were used to characterize stochastic optimization stability and were not interpreted as independent participant experiments. The results indicate that the proposed method achieved improved overall classification performance, warning-related reliability, and repeated-run stability compared with single-modal, conventional machine-learning, direct-concatenation, and temporal-fusion baselines. The findings provide pilot evidence that physiological-behavioral fusion can support operational human-factor risk-state classification under the examined port-operation conditions. Larger cross-operator and cross-scenario studies are required to establish broader generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.