Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42782696›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Hearing It Right, Doing It Safely: A Reflex-Inspired Safety Gatekeeper for Voice-Controlled Exoskeleton Arm Manipulation.

Emanuel Muntean, Monica Leba, Andreea Ionica

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emanuel MunteanSystem Control and Computer Engineering Department, University of Petrosani, 332006 Petrosani, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-5049-7965
Monica LebaSystem Control and Computer Engineering Department, University of Petrosani, 332006 Petrosani, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-4083-9121
Andreea IonicaManagement and Industrial Engineering Department, University of Petrosani, 332006 Petrosani, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-1988-9340

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voice interfaces to anthropomorphic robotic arms are typically evaluated without a formal safety layer, or with safety as a post hoc filter trusting the transcript, leaving transcript corruption unaddressed. This paper presents the DAS3 Neuro-Voice Controller, a voice-driven pipeline for a musculoskeletal arm model, evaluated here as a kinematic surrogate for upper-limb exoskeleton and prosthetic control, built on three commitments: on-device intent classification via a 44 M-parameter DistilBERT classifier over a bounded nine-command vocabulary; a deterministic three-layer Gatekeeper enforcing semantic validation, kinematic feasibility, and hard safety constraints independent of classifier confidence; and an upstream Phonetic Interceptor sanitising characteristic ASR mutilations of anatomical and safety terms ("four arm" → "forearm"). Trained on a class-balanced corpus of 3591 expressions and evaluated on fourteen non-native English speakers, the classifier reached 99.95% top-1 accuracy across 1847 oracle-resolvable utterances; the Gatekeeper reduced Priority Override Failure to 0.0%, rejected 100% of out-of-domain speech, and held false-rejection at 2.02%. Against a keyword-spotter baseline the pipeline delivered a 17.4-fold improvement in end-to-end success; the acoustic front-end remains the main weakness. Upstream input repair and downstream deterministic gating emerge as first-class components of safety-critical voice interfaces for assistive systems.

Indexed as

assistive roboticsexoskeleton robotshuman–robot interactionintent classificationsafety guardrailssmall language modelsvoice controlwearable robot

Identifiers

PMID42782696
PMCPMC13604104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.