ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
HERA: Bioinspired Separation of Local Fault Response and Language-Model Scheduling in Simulated Quadruped Control.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Language-model inference can delay emergency supervision, but cancellation alone cannot provide an immediate physical response. HERA (Hierarchical Event-driven Reflex Architecture) separates a measurement-driven deterministic local action from language-service scheduling, with biological inspiration limited to temporal separation and local feedback. A fixed 1472-trial campaign evaluated canonical-command scheduling, simulated actuator faults and live integration. Across three workloads, the mean validated-command latency was 0.486-0.512 s with preemption, 1.476-11.101 s with single-lane FIFO and 0.543-0.575 s with two-slot serving. The original detector identified all 544 complete faults but missed all 160 half-strength faults. A separately frozen 560-trial follow-up evaluated a sustained effort-discrepancy warning without changing control. On the same 160 new half-strength trajectories, the original detector again missed every fault, whereas the warning detected all faults with mean delays of 161.0 and 155.5 ms of simulated time in clean and noisy conditions. No false onset occurred in 2400 simulated robot-seconds of new healthy exposure. This addresses conditional detection sensitivity, not improved physical recovery. In the original campaign, local support reduced the mean upright deficit but worsened some paired cases and reduced terminal speed; every physical trial met the fixed-horizon safety criterion. All 96 normal integrated supervisory commands completed 50-step holds and returned to local fallback, and local action persisted under injected transport failure. Because supervision reaffirmed the existing support array, these results establish neither additional LLM physical benefit nor general diagnosis or hardware safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.