ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Electrode-Level Low-Dimensionality Does Not Guarantee Sensor Redundancy: Dual-Dataset, Participant-Grouped Validation of Parsimonious Myoelectric Gesture Decoding.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrode-level compressibility may not imply transferable hardware redundancy in biomimetic myoelectric interfaces. This study tested whether sensor-count sufficiency discovered by trial-level analysis survives participant-grouped evaluation. Dataset A comprised 398 archived Myo Armband trials from eight gestures. Dataset B contained 864 one-second trials from 36 participants and six gestures. A timestamp audit identified extensive repeated channel values; Dataset B was therefore analyzed on a conservative 100 Hz grid with 20-45 Hz filtering. Sensor subsets and RBF-SVM parameters were selected exclusively within grouped training data using repeated nested validation. Electrode-level NMF, all 28 fixed six-sensor layouts, cyclic re-indexing, channel-block ablation, participant-cluster bootstrap, PCA, and time-domain-only sensitivity analyses were evaluated. Dataset A yielded 97.74% accuracy with six sensors and 97.93% with eight. In Dataset B, accuracy was 75.96% ± 7.47% with six sensors and 77.93% ± 6.49% with eight; the paired difference was -1.97 percentage points (corrected 95% CI, -5.50 to 1.56). The participant-cluster bootstrap interval was -3.70 to -0.31 points. Active-gesture accuracy was 71.67% and 74.35%, respectively. All fixed six-sensor layouts averaged 74.59%. Three NMF components reconstructed 89.95% ± 1.78% of held-out-participant normalized RMS patterns, with no nonconverged folds. One-position cyclic re-indexing reduced accuracy to 40.28%; channel-block ablation caused losses of 0.62-6.71 points. Low-dimensional electrode-level RMS structure did not establish removable sensors across unseen users. Compact biomimetic interfaces require registration, adaptation, or equivariant processing before physical sensor reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.