Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42782674›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Host Response Impairs Tissue Integration of a Fibrin Hydrogel Scaffold Containing Poly(ε-caprolactone) Nanofibers for Peripheral Nerve Repair.

Haktan Altinova, Dorothee Hodde, José L Gerardo-Nava, Axel Dievernich, Lmar Arman, Melissa Büchler, Andreas Kriebel, Jörg Mey, Hans Clusmann, Joachim Weis and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Haktan AltinovaInstitute of Neuropathology, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1039-7553
Dorothee HoddeInstitute of Neuropathology, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
José L Gerardo-NavaDWI-Leibniz Institute for Interactive Materials, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Axel DievernichFEG Textiltechnik Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH, 52070 Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6677-9801
Lmar ArmanInstitute of Neuropathology, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Melissa BüchlerDepartment of Neurology, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Andreas KriebelInstitute of Biology II, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Jörg MeyInstitute of Biology II, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8919-3149
Hans ClusmannDepartment of Neurosurgery, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8258-9346
Joachim WeisInstitute of Neuropathology, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Gary A BrookInstitute of Neuropathology, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Pascal AchenbachInstitute of Neuropathology, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2607-860X

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG project number 171108486
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of bioengineered conduits for the repair of large peripheral nerve defects remains challenging. Here, we introduce a biomimetic fibrin hydrogel scaffold containing stacked arrays of aligned poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) nanofibers that mimics the naturally forming fibrin cable seen in transection injuries. We further evaluated the additional encapsulation of Schwann cells (SCs) into the fibrin hydrogel. Nerve regeneration was examined in a 15 mm rat sciatic nerve resection model over a period of 12 weeks, comparing our scaffolds against the autograft, a collagen hollow tube, and a lesion-only control group. Functional and morphometric analyses revealed that the autograft supported the strongest regeneration, followed by the SC-seeded fibrin-nanofiber scaffold and the hollow tube. Unexpectedly, a macrophage-rich core devoid of SCs and regenerated axons formed within both fibrin-nanofiber scaffolds around persisting PCL nanofibers. This core impaired the regenerative potential of the non-SC-seeded fibrin-nanofiber scaffold to the extent that functional regeneration was comparable to that of the lesion-only control group. While the scaffolds were designed to closely mimic and support the natural regenerative environment following nerve transection, our results reveal that these theoretical considerations do not necessarily translate into practice.

Indexed as

bioengineeringbiomimeticblood–nerve barrierelectrospinningguidance cueshost responsetissue engineeringtopography

Identifiers

PMID42782674
PMCPMC13604744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.