ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Online GP-MPC Command Supervision for Robust Reinforcement Learning-Based Quadruped Locomotion.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reinforcement learning-based quadruped locomotion policies can exhibit command-tracking errors under terrain variations and unmodeled dynamics. This study proposes an online bounded Gaussian Process-enhanced model predictive control framework, termed Gaussian Process-Model Predictive Control-Reinforcement Learning(GP-MPC-RL), for command-level supervision of a pretrained locomotion policy. A frozen PPO policy generates the low-level locomotion behavior, while an acados-based MPC supervisor adjusts the velocity command using a nominal command-response model. An online Gaussian Process learns the one-step residual between the nominal prediction and measured robot response, and its uncertainty-weighted forward-velocity correction is incorporated into the MPC prediction. The framework was evaluated in Isaac Lab using a Unitree Go2 quadruped robot model over 20 paired rough-terrain trials at target velocities of 0.3, 0.5, and 0.7 m/s; GP-MPC-RL reduced the mean forward-velocity root mean square error (RMSE) relative to PPO by 38.3%, 21.3%, and 10.1%, respectively. Under a 5 kg payload, GP-MPC-RL reduced velocity RMSE by 29.0% relative to MPC-RL and reduced the 0-5 kg payload-induced degradation by 53.0% (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.