Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42782660›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

A Multi-Strategy Enhanced Crested Porcupine Optimizer with Targeted Defense Mechanism Improvement for Global Optimization.

Zhaoyong Fan, Xi Li, Zhenhua Xiao, Lianying Zou, Wangming Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhaoyong FanSchool of Information and Artificial Intelligence, Nanchang Institute of Science and Technology, Nanchang 330108, China.ORCID 0009-0006-0560-7612
Xi LiSchool of Information and Artificial Intelligence, Nanchang Institute of Science and Technology, Nanchang 330108, China.
Zhenhua XiaoSchool of Information and Artificial Intelligence, Nanchang Institute of Science and Technology, Nanchang 330108, China.ORCID 0009-0008-6398-2028
Lianying ZouSchool of Information and Artificial Intelligence, Nanchang Institute of Science and Technology, Nanchang 330108, China.
Wangming ZhangSchool of Information and Artificial Intelligence, Nanchang Institute of Science and Technology, Nanchang 330108, China.ORCID 0009-0001-0514-5976

Funding

Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China 20252BAC240201Science and Technology Research Project of Jiangxi Provincial Department of Education GJJ2402807
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metaheuristic algorithms are widely used to solve complex optimization problems, but the trade-off between exploration and exploitation often limits their performance. The Crested Porcupine Optimizer (CPO) employs four bio-inspired defense mechanisms and achieves competitive performance, but it still tends to converge prematurely, initialize populations poorly, and rely on static parameters that cannot adapt to different phases. This paper proposes a Multi-Strategy Enhanced Crested Porcupine Optimizer (MSCPO) with four phase-targeted enhancement strategies: (1) Kent Chaos Opposition-Based Learning Initialization (KCOL) improves the initial population distribution through chaotic-weighted reflection; (2) Arctic Puffin Optimization (APO)-Inspired Dual-Modal Evasion (APO-DME) reduces dependence on the global best solution and increases population diversity through dual-mode differential perturbation; (3) Adaptive Dual-Differential Perturbation (ADDP) refines the search by combining population diversity and elite guidance information; (4) Periodic Dynamic Adaptive Perturbation (PDAP) enhances exploitation through periodic trigonometric perturbation and a fitness-conditioned update rule. These strategies interact across the optimization process to strengthen each defense mechanism at the appropriate phase. On the CEC 2017 and CEC 2022 benchmark suites, MSCPO achieves the best overall mean rank among all compared algorithms, with an overall rank of 2.638 on CEC 2017 and 2.375 on CEC 2022. A full-factorial ablation over all 16 strategy combinations confirms that each strategy contributes positively: removing any single strategy degrades the overall mean rank, and the complete MSCPO achieves the best mean rank (3.34), significantly outperforming all single-strategy variants (Wilcoxon signed-rank test,

Indexed as

adaptive perturbationchaotic initializationcrested porcupine optimizerdual-modal evasionengineering optimizationmulti-strategy enhancement

Identifiers

PMID42782660
PMCPMC13604152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.