ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Bio-Inspired Perception-Memory Coupling for Robust LiDAR-Inertial Odometry in Dynamic Environments.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bionic intelligent robots operating in unstructured dynamic environments require perception systems that regulate uncertain observations according to their reliability and avoid converting transient disturbances into persistent spatial references. Inspired by reliability-weighted multisensory integration and by a functional abstraction of persistence-based evidence consolidation in biological navigation, this paper proposes a bio-inspired reliability-constrained LiDAR-inertial odometry framework. Each point-to-map observation is evaluated using residual consistency, local geometric quality, and voxel-level temporal stability. The fused reliability score regulates both the ESIKF state update and incremental map maintenance: low-confidence observations are continuously down-weighted, highly reliable points are admitted to the persistent map, ambiguous points are retained in short-term candidate memory for multi-frame verification, and unreliable points are rejected. The framework translates biological design principles into an engineering perception-memory architecture rather than reproducing a specific neural circuit. Repeated experiments on public datasets and a wheeled mobile robot platform show comparable accuracy in two normal sequences. Across five dynamic sequences, the complete method reduces localization RMSE by 14.08-28.88% relative to Fast-LIO2 and achieves lower mean RMSE than Dynamic-LIO on all five evaluated dynamic sequences. Frozen-map evaluation further yields 7.77-15.71% lower point-to-map RMSE together with higher consistent-correspondence ratios and coverage, while the maximum mean RMSE deviation in the parameter-sensitivity study remains below 7.2%. The maximum measured processing time is 18.69 ms per scan, maintaining real-time operation for a 10 Hz LiDAR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.