ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2026
Co-Designing a Provincial Newborn Screening Implementation Framework in Pakistan Using a Sequential Blended Workshop Model.
Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Newborn screening (NBS) in Pakistan remains limited by fragmented service delivery, uneven provincial capacity, and the absence of an implementation pathway that links policy intent to operational planning. This study aimed to co-design a provincial NBS implementation framework for Punjab. To do so, we used a sequential blended workshop model supported by visual planning methods. We conducted a qualitative, three-phase co-design process with 19 participants from laboratory medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics, public health, academia, and policy. Phase I consisted of pre-work and an online workshop to establish a shared knowledge base and identify implementation barriers and enablers. Phase II used an in-person, visually facilitated planning workshop to translate these findings into a provincial NBS implementation framework. Phase III involved a asynchronous email-based review to refine the framework and reach consensus. Content analysis from Phase I identified five implementation domains: physical and technical infrastructure, operational systems, clinical integration, workforce and engagement, and governance and policy. In Phase II, these domains were translated into a visual implementation framework that specified priorities, stakeholders, risks, enablers, and action areas for phased rollout. Congenital hypothyroidism was identified as the most feasible entry-point condition. The final framework positioned NBS not as a stand-alone pilot, but as a coordinated provincial system requiring governance, financing, referral pathways, quality assurance, and workforce development. This study contributes an implementation-oriented model for moving from fragmented NBS initiatives to a provincial implementation framework in a low- and middle-income setting. It also offers a practical foundation for broader national scale-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.