Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42782577›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2026

Cognition in Cardiovascular Disease.

Arash Salardini, Sayena Azarbar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arash SalardiniGlenn Biggs Institute for Alzheimer's and Neurodegenerative Diseases, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA. salardini@uthscsa.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0193-6217
Sayena AzarbarRiver City Cardiology, Metropolitan Methodist Hospital, San Antonio, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAcute cerebrovascular events once dominated efforts to protect the brain from cardiovascular disease. As stroke prevention and treatment have advanced, attention has broadened to the more continuous vascular processes that contribute to cognitive decline across later life. This review organizes cardiovascular brain injury by route, direct structural injury versus indirect mediated pathways, and tempo, acute events versus chronic processes, with vessel caliber determining lesion topography. RECENT

findingsVascular and Alzheimer pathology commonly coexist in older adults with cognitive impairment, and their relationship appears bidirectional but asymmetric: Alzheimer pathology can directly injure the cerebral vasculature, while vascular dysfunction may facilitate Alzheimer pathology and, more clearly, accumulated vascular injury lowers the threshold at which Alzheimer pathology becomes clinically expressed. Covert infarction, microbleeds, white matter disease, and blood-brain barrier disruption accumulate into a cumulative vascular substrate that erodes cognition over decades without requiring a recognized clinical event, and the clinical syndrome follows the lesion, with the subcortical dysexecutive phenotype the modal presentation. Evidence from SPRINT MIND, FINGER, US POINTER, BRAIN-AF, LACI-2, CREST-2, and Mendelian randomization identifies blood pressure control as the best-established intervention, uses discordant and null findings to refine presumed mechanisms, and frames the emerging dilemma of anti-amyloid therapy in patients with substantial vascular disease. In the mixed vascular and Alzheimer disease that dominates late-life dementia, the vascular component is often the more modifiable, and cardiovascular risk management remains among the most actionable strategies for preserving cognition.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCognitionCognition DisordersAnimalsBrainHumansAnti-amyloid therapyCardiovascular diseaseCerebral small vessel diseaseMixed dementiaVascular cognitive impairment

Identifiers

PMID42782577
PMCPMC13612708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.