ArticleCarbon balance and management2026
China's carbon emission trading and income inequality: evidence from factor substitution.
Article in Carbon balance and management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As carbon pricing mechanisms gain global prominence, understanding their distributional impacts, particularly in developing economies, becomes crucial for the design of equitable climate policies. We explore the effect of carbon emission trading (CET) policy on income inequality in China through integrated theoretical and empirical analysis. We find that the CET policy significantly reduces income inequality, and this conclusion passed the robustness tests. Theoretical analysis shows that if carbon emission allowances are treated as an input factor of production, when carbon prices are relatively low, firms tend to substitute labor for carbon emission allowances, thereby increasing the labor income share (LIS). Empirical testing also confirms that the mitigation of income inequality through CET is attributable to the increase in the LIS. In addition, the equalizing effect is more pronounced in cities with higher initial income inequality and greater marketization. Government environmental expenditure and smooth labor market mobility also have positive synergistic effects. Our research provides policy insights on balancing emissions reduction with social equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.