ReviewEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2026
Heavy metals in fish: bioaccumulation, toxicity, and human health risk.
Review in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The problem of heavy metal pollution of aquatic ecosystems represents one of the rising global environmental and public health threats. Unlike many organic contaminants, heavy metals are non-degradable and remain in ecosystems for an indefinite period of time, accumulating in the tissues of fish and bioaccumulating within food chains by orders of magnitude higher than ambient water concentrations. This paper reviews the major mechanisms and pathways of bioaccumulation and biomagnification of five priority heavy metals, arsenic, mercury, cadmium, chromium, and lead spanning all aspects of the contamination cycle, from their anthropogenic and geogenic origin to the specifics of biological uptake in fish tissues, quantifiable by means of the bioconcentration factor (BCF) and bioaccumulation factor (BAF) indicators; from the effects of toxicity in fish, spanning molecular, histopathological, physiological, reproductive, and behavioural levels of organisation, to the corresponding effects in humans, based on epidemiological data from fish-consuming populations; and from available toxicological risk assessments of human health based on target hazard quotient (THQ), hazard index (HI), and cancer risk (CR) methods to the comparison of different methods of remediation, which are considered according to the efficiency and scalability. Knowledge gaps include a lack of standardised BCF/BAF data, the frequent reliance on total rather than speciated metal concentrations, which for arsenic can overstate the toxicologically relevant exposure by roughly an order of magnitude, poor epidemiological dose-response evidence in fish-consuming populations, and the unavailability of field data on nanotechnological cleanup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42782545What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.