ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2026
Comparative evaluation of GWAS-prioritized SNP, SSR, and insertion-type structural variant marker panels for genomic prediction in soybean.
Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) is an important crop worldwide, and improving genomic prediction efficiency for complex traits is essential for soybean breeding. In this study, two public soybean datasets for drought tolerance (DT) and plant height (PH) were used to evaluate the predictive value of SNP, simple sequence repeat (SSR), and insertion-type structural variant (INS-SV) markers. Genome-wide markers were identified from whole-genome resequencing data and filtered for downstream analyses. GWAS-assisted marker prioritization was performed using five methods, including GLM, MLM, FarmCPU, fastGWA, and BOLT-LMM, and Top-K marker panels with different densities were evaluated using 12 genomic selection models. GWAS-prioritized marker panels generally outperformed random 5 K SNP panels and achieved comparable or improved prediction accuracy relative to the full-marker SNP GBLUP baseline within the internal validation framework. A marker density of 5 K provided a practical balance between prediction accuracy and marker number in the present datasets. The relative performance of combined-marker panels was trait- and GWAS-method-dependent, with small positive (Δr) values for some DT panels but negligible gains for PH. GBLUP and Bayesian regression models showed relatively stable performance. Overall, GWAS-assisted marker prioritization provides an efficient feature-selection strategy for soybean genomic prediction, whereas multi-type marker panels should be evaluated against a standard SNP reference on a trait- and method-specific basis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42782536What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.