Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42782536›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2026

Comparative evaluation of GWAS-prioritized SNP, SSR, and insertion-type structural variant marker panels for genomic prediction in soybean.

Xiaoyue Zhu, Ruixin Zhang, Changhong Guo, Yongjun Shu

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaoyue ZhuKey Laboratory of Molecular Cytogenetics and Genetic Breeding of Heilongjiang Province, College of Life Science and Technology, Harbin Normal University, NO.1 Shida Road, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150025, PR China.
Ruixin ZhangKey Laboratory of Molecular Cytogenetics and Genetic Breeding of Heilongjiang Province, College of Life Science and Technology, Harbin Normal University, NO.1 Shida Road, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150025, PR China.
Changhong GuoKey Laboratory of Molecular Cytogenetics and Genetic Breeding of Heilongjiang Province, College of Life Science and Technology, Harbin Normal University, NO.1 Shida Road, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150025, PR China.
Yongjun ShuKey Laboratory of Molecular Cytogenetics and Genetic Breeding of Heilongjiang Province, College of Life Science and Technology, Harbin Normal University, NO.1 Shida Road, Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150025, PR China. shuyj@hrbnu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4463-0218

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province PL2025C051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) is an important crop worldwide, and improving genomic prediction efficiency for complex traits is essential for soybean breeding. In this study, two public soybean datasets for drought tolerance (DT) and plant height (PH) were used to evaluate the predictive value of SNP, simple sequence repeat (SSR), and insertion-type structural variant (INS-SV) markers. Genome-wide markers were identified from whole-genome resequencing data and filtered for downstream analyses. GWAS-assisted marker prioritization was performed using five methods, including GLM, MLM, FarmCPU, fastGWA, and BOLT-LMM, and Top-K marker panels with different densities were evaluated using 12 genomic selection models. GWAS-prioritized marker panels generally outperformed random 5 K SNP panels and achieved comparable or improved prediction accuracy relative to the full-marker SNP GBLUP baseline within the internal validation framework. A marker density of 5 K provided a practical balance between prediction accuracy and marker number in the present datasets. The relative performance of combined-marker panels was trait- and GWAS-method-dependent, with small positive (Δr) values for some DT panels but negligible gains for PH. GBLUP and Bayesian regression models showed relatively stable performance. Overall, GWAS-assisted marker prioritization provides an efficient feature-selection strategy for soybean genomic prediction, whereas multi-type marker panels should be evaluated against a standard SNP reference on a trait- and method-specific basis.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantGenome-Wide Association StudyGlycine maxMicrosatellite RepeatsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideDrought ResistanceGenetic MarkersGenomicsGenotypeModels, GeneticPhenotypePlant BreedingQuantitative Trait LociGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID42782536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.