ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2026
Knowledge of lactose intolerance in Italian adults: a cross‑sectional assessment.
Article in European journal of nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess knowledge of lactose intolerance (LI) in Italian adults, identifying major knowledge gaps and factors associated with awareness.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted between December 2024 and March 2025 among Italian adults (≥ 18 years). A newly developed 39-item online survey assessed knowledge of LI across four modules (definition, symptoms, diagnosis, and management). The knowledge score (range: - 39; +39) was calculated and participants were classified into three knowledge levels based on the tertile distribution of scores: "low knowledge", "intermediate knowledge", and "high knowledge"'. Univariable and multivariable ordinal logistic regression were carried out to investigate the association between respondents' characteristics and LI knowledge.
resultsA total of 2025 respondents (85.4% female) were included in the analysis. The mean knowledge score was 15.4 ± 7.6. Overall, 36.6% of respondents showed low, 32.2% intermediate, and 31.2% high knowledge. Common misconceptions concern the belief that trace amounts of lactose (e.g., in lactose-free products or medications) can trigger symptoms and that a lactose-free diet does not pose a risk for nutritional deficiencies. Questions on unvalidated diagnostic methods elicited many "I don't know" responses, reflecting uncertainty about their reliability. Female gender, confirmed LI diagnosis, higher education and nutrition training were associated with higher knowledge, with the latter showing the strongest association (Odds Ratio 10.8, 95% CI: 8.30-14.2).
conclusionThese findings highlight persistent misconceptions about LI and underscore the need for targeted educational strategies to improve public understanding and reduce inappropriate diagnostic and dietary practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.