Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42782499›Full record

ArticleJournal of youth and adolescence2026

Associations Between Protective Factors and Prosocial Behaviors Among Children and Adolescents with Childhood Maltreatment: A Three-level Meta-Analysis.

Lei Yang, Rui Yuan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lei YangDepartment of Social Work, School of Sociology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Rui YuanDepartment of Sociology and Psychology, School of Public Administration, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. yuanrui@scu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6086-1609

Funding

National Social Science Fund of China 23CSH071National Social Science Fund of China 25BSH054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Childhood maltreatment has been extensively studied for its negative developmental consequences, yet the role of protective factors in promoting prosocial behaviors among affected children and adolescents has remained unclear. The present study addressed this gap by conducting a three-level meta-analysis to examine the associations between four types of protective factors (psychological capital, emotion regulation ability, parenting quality and family functioning, and social support) and prosocial behaviors in this population. A total of 17 studies with 34 effect sizes were included (n = 43,477). The results showed that most types of protective factors exhibited small-to-moderate positive associations with prosocial behaviors (r = .314 to 0.406, p < .001), whereas emotion regulation ability showed a non-significant and near-zero correlation (r = - .017; z = - 0.204, p = .838). A significant moderating effect emerged for study quality, with higher-quality studies yielding stronger associations. Although the type of protective factor did not serve as a significant overall moderator, emotion regulation ability demonstrated a significantly weaker association with prosocial behaviors compared with psychological capital. These findings point to the potential relevance of psychological capital, family-based resources, and social support for interventions targeting the maltreated, whereas emotion regulation training may be less promising as a standalone strategy. Policy efforts that support parenting programs and community-based social services could also be considered, though these suggestions remain tentative pending further causal evidence.

Indexed as

Childhood maltreatmentEmotion regulation abilityMeta-analysisProsocial behaviorsProtective factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.