Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42782487›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026

From clinical challenges to innovation: an idea finding approach for advancing healthcare.

Emily Spicker, Sonja Stabenow, Sidra Rashid, Lukas Bernhard, Charlotte Haid, Maximilian Berlet, Johannes Fottner, Dirk Wilhelm

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emily SpickerResearch Group MITI, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, TUM University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany. emily.spicker@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-7567-8130
Sonja StabenowResearch Group MITI, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, TUM University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Sidra RashidResearch Group MITI, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, TUM University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Lukas BernhardResearch Group MITI, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, TUM University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Charlotte HaidChair of Materials Handling, Material Flow, Logistics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
Maximilian BerletResearch Group MITI, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, TUM University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Johannes FottnerChair of Materials Handling, Material Flow, Logistics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
Dirk WilhelmResearch Group MITI, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, TUM University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.

Funding

Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Wissenschaft und Kunst 1200/2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe workload in European healthcare is increasing due to demographic changes, as fewer employees must care for an ever-growing number of patients. Solutions that ease staff stress are needed, but successful development and integration require a thorough understanding of current challenges. Healthcare professionals identify opportunities to enhance patient care and processes, yet often lack the necessary knowledge and resources to implement their ideas. Engineers and management possess these resources but frequently lack insight into daily clinical struggles.

methodsThis article presents a set of methods for analyzing clinical processes and identifying areas that need optimization from a non-medical perspective. The methods include observation, needs finding, and a system to prioritize and group identified needs.

resultsApplied at a German university hospital, they produce a comprehensive list of needs that can inspire new projects. Using this methodology, we identify opportunities for improvement in documentation, purchasing, communication, information access, material preparation, and physical workload.

conclusionThe proposed methodology allows needs to be connected to actionable solutions. It provides a holistic overview, allowing for a comprehensive understanding, followed by a condensation of the issues that streamlines the generation of new topics and ideas.

Indexed as

HealthcareMethodologyNeeds findingObservational studyProcess analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.