ArticleJournal of bioethical inquiry2026
Healthy Ageing without Health Equity? Capability, Justice, and Ageing Governance in the UN Decade.
Article in Journal of bioethical inquiry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The U.N. Decade of Healthy Ageing frames later life through functional ability, environments, and well-being rather than through demographic burden alone. This article argues that healthy ageing becomes ethically unstable when it is pursued without health equity. It first distinguishes the historically influential vocabulary of active ageing from the later healthy-ageing framework centred on functional ability. It then develops a bioethical account of capability-enabling ageing governance: assistance and long-term care are ethically necessary, but they become insufficient when downstream service delivery under scarcity substitutes for upstream conditions that sustain agency, mobility, care, and social participation. The article introduces the malaise state as a conceptual diagnostic category for welfare drift under demographic, fiscal, administrative, and commercial pressure. It also formulates the knowledge-to-equity conversion problem: societies may expand biomedical knowledge, digital health, and innovation while failing to secure the conditions through which those resources become equitable functional ability. The article concludes that the Decade should be evaluated as a justice project, not as a behavioural exhortation to older persons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42782473What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.