ReviewClinical journal of gastroenterology2026
Recent advances in managing esophageal epiphrenic diverticula: a review of the impact of endoscopy, high-resolution manometry, and POEM.
Review in Clinical journal of gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epiphrenic diverticula (ED) are pulsion diverticula found in the distal esophagus. They are rare and often associated with esophageal motility disorders. Given technological advances over the past number of years that have impacted the care of patients with ED, it is worthwhile reviewing the recent literature on this entity. As endoscopy is now commonly practiced, there is evidence that ED is mainly being diagnosed endoscopically and that more asymptomatic patients may be diagnosed. The age of patients with ED may also be increasing given increases in life expectancies. Recent studies using high-resolution manometry (HRM), the gold standard for diagnosing motility disorders, have shown that ~ 50-60% of ED patients are diagnosed with a motility disorder according to the Chicago Classification. Studies have also confirmed that the presence of ED is a risk factor for an unsuccessful HRM exam. Finally, with the advent of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), a successful endoscopic treatment is available. While there are several variations to the procedure, such as whether it is performed with septotomy or without, and whether the myotomy is extended through the lower esophageal sphincter and into the stomach or not, POEM has changed the therapeutic algorithm of ED. There is evidence that it has excellent technical and clinical success rates equivalent to that of surgery, but with lower adverse events compared to surgical procedures. In conclusion, recent technological developments have provided a better understanding of ED and offer patients a highly successful, minimally-invasive endoscopic treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42782460What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.