Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42782403›Full record

ReviewNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026

B-cell targeting strategies for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: from non-cellular therapies to CAR-engineered cell therapies.

Nilufar Salomova, Lusine G Khachatryan, Aminjon Amonov, Murodjon Normatov, Nasiba Khalmatova, Anvarjon Rashidov, Bekzod Babamuratov

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nilufar SalomovaDepartment of Neurology, Abu Ali ibn Sino Bukhara State Medical Institute, Bukhara, Uzbekistan. salomovanilufar409@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-2060-9142
Lusine G KhachatryanDepartment of Pediatric Neurology, N.F. Filatov Clinical Institute of Children's Health, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
Aminjon AmonovDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Tashkent State Medical Institute, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-7355-637X
Murodjon NormatovDepartment of Propaedeutics of Internal Diseases, Samarkand State Medical University, Samarkand, Uzbekistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-8334-7023
Nasiba KhalmatovaDepartment of Pedagogy, University of Economics and Pedagogy, Karshi, Uzbekistan.
Anvarjon RashidovBukhara State Pedagogical Institute, Bukhara, Uzbekistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6424-3277
Bekzod BabamuratovDepartment of Medicine, Termez University of Economics and Service, Termez, Uzbekistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9333-466X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccumulating evidence indicates that B-cell lineages play a central role in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS). This understanding has reshaped the therapeutic landscape of MS, particularly following the success of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), which have become a cornerstone of MS treatment. Despite their efficacy in reducing relapse rates and slowing disability accumulation, current B-cell-depleting therapies have important limitations, including incomplete control of compartmentalized immune responses within the central nervous system (CNS).

methodsThis review summarizes the progress and limitations of current and emerging B-cell-targeting strategies for MS. We discuss established non-cellular approaches, including monoclonal antibodies, Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, and B-cell activating factor (BAFF) inhibitors, and examine the rationale, potential advantages, and challenges of emerging chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered cell therapies.

resultsAnti-CD20 mAbs have demonstrated significant clinical efficacy; however, their limited CNS penetration and broad depletion of B-cell populations highlight the need for more targeted approaches. BTK inhibitors represent an emerging strategy to modulate B-cell and myeloid-cell signaling, while BAFF-targeting therapies have provided important insights into the complex role of B-cell survival pathways in MS. CAR-engineered cell therapies have emerged as a promising cellular approach capable of inducing profound and potentially durable depletion of pathogenic B-cell populations, including CNS-resident B-cell subsets.

conclusionsB-cell-targeting therapies continue to expand the therapeutic landscape of MS. Although current non-cellular approaches have improved disease control, their limitations emphasize the need for next-generation strategies. CAR-engineered cell therapies represent a promising frontier with the potential to achieve more sustained immune modulation and address some unmet therapeutic challenges in MS.

Indexed as

B-LymphocytesCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyMultiple SclerosisAgammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine KinaseAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalHumansReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAgammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine KinaseAntibodies, MonoclonalReceptors, Chimeric AntigenBAFF inhibitorsB-cellsBTK inhibitorsCAR-T cell therapyMonoclonal antibodiesMultiple sclerosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.