ArticleClinical oral investigations2026
Load-bearing capacity and Weibull characteristics of inlay-retained fixed dental prosthesis: Effect of zirconia type, bonded substrate and aging.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study evaluated the load-bearing capacity and reliability of different zirconia materials used for inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses (IRFDPs), considering the influence of substrate type (tooth substrate or resin composite) and thermo-mechanical aging. MATERIALS AND
methodsIRFDPs (N = 160) were fabricated using four zirconia materials: IPS e.max ZirCAD LT (3Y-TZP), Katana YML (3Y-5Y graded zirconia), Katana HTML Plus, and Katana STML (n = 40 each). Restorations were adhesively cemented onto tooth or resin composite substrates and tested either under dry conditions or after thermo-mechanical aging (1,200,000 cycles, 50 N, 5-55 °C). Fracture load was determined using monotonic load-to-fracture testing. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Reliability of durability was assessed using Weibull analysis.
resultsUnder dry conditions, material (p = 0.0047), substrate (p = 0.0237), and their interaction (p = 0.0004) significantly influenced fracture load. YML-composite (1406 ± 386 N) and HTML-composite (1142 ± 249 N) showed higher values than STML-composite (553 ± 246 N). No significant differences were observed on tooth. substrate After aging, material and interaction effects remained significant (p < 0.05). HTML-tooth showed the highest fracture load (1727 ± 351 N), while STML-composite showed the lowest (718 ± 292 N). Weibull analysis indicated comparable reliability after aging.
conclusionsZirconia type and substrate significantly influenced mechanical performance of IRFDPs. High-translucent and graded zirconia showed substrate-dependent behavior, whereas 3Y zirconia was more stable. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Zirconia selection and bonding substrate influence fracture resistance of IRFDPs. High-translucent zirconia requires careful substrate selection, while 3Y zirconia provides more consistent performance in posterior applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.