ArticleOecologia2026
Stream biodiversity and function benefit from forest fragments in agricultural landscapes.
Article in Oecologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Riparian forests buffer stream ecosystems from intensive land use. However, with ongoing land-use changes, riparian forests often remain as isolated fragments. Despite this, the relevance of isolated forest fragments in deforested landscapes remains unclear. We evaluated how downstream forest fragments can buffer the effects of upstream deforestation and whether upstream forest fragments can mitigate the impacts of downstream deforestation on abiotic conditions, biodiversity, and stream functioning. Additionally, we assessed how subsidized leaf litter of varied quality and diversity influences leaf-associated invertebrate assemblages and leaf litter breakdown rates. We conducted leaf breakdown experiments in eight streams within agricultural catchments-four flowing from an upstream forest fragment to a deforested reach, and four from a deforested area to a downstream forest fragment. Downstream forest fragments reduced the effects of upstream deforestation, as evidenced by higher shredder diversity and lower scraper abundance in these reaches than in the upstream deforested reaches. Upstream forest fragments also mitigated downstream deforestation by reducing sediment load, moderating water temperatures, and enhancing substrate diversity. The taxonomic similarity between the forest upstream and the deforested downstream reaches highlighted the role of forest fragments as sources of invertebrates and organic matter for deforested reaches. In forest upstream reaches, invertebrates increased the breakdown rates of C-labile fast-decomposing leaf species, whereas leaf diversity accelerated the processing of nitrogen-fixing slow-decomposing leaves. These results demonstrate that the presence of forest fragments in agricultural catchments benefits water quality, invertebrate communities, and leaf litter breakdown, thereby contributing to the resilience of stream ecosystems to land-use changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.