Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42782244›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2026

Deep Learning Classification of Uveal Melanoma and Metastatic Carcinoma on Cytology Specimens: A Single-Center Experience.

Max Jackson, Helen Kalirai, Rumana Hussain, Heinrich Heimann, Yalin Zheng, Sarah E Coupland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Max JacksonDepartment of Eye and Vision Science, University of Liverpool, William Henry Duncan Building, Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom.
Helen KaliraiDepartment of Eye and Vision Science, University of Liverpool, William Henry Duncan Building, Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom.
Rumana HussainDepartment of Eye and Vision Science, University of Liverpool, William Henry Duncan Building, Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom.
Heinrich HeimannDepartment of Eye and Vision Science, University of Liverpool, William Henry Duncan Building, Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom.
Yalin ZhengDepartment of Eye and Vision Science, University of Liverpool, William Henry Duncan Building, Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom.
Sarah E CouplandDepartment of Eye and Vision Science, University of Liverpool, William Henry Duncan Building, Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Differentiating between a choroidal melanoma and metastatic carcinoma to the choroid on cytological specimens presents significant diagnostic challenges due to subtle morphological differences in the sparse cells available in the sample and the increasing scarcity of specialist ocular pathologists. This study developed and evaluated deep learning models for automated classification of May-Grünwald-Giemsa-stained cytospin whole slide images (WSIs) to support diagnostic decision-making. Methods: Cytospin WSIs from 87 patients (50 with choroidal melanoma and 37 with metastatic carcinoma to the choroid) who underwent trans-scleral fine-needle aspiration biopsy at the Liverpool Ocular Oncology Center were digitized and tiled into 256 × 256 pixel patches. Variants of U-Net architectures were trained on 692 manually annotated tiles for tumor cell segmentation. The diagnostic decision model was developed and evaluated using different classification frameworks for best diagnostic performance: five convolutional neural network, three vision transformer (ViT) models, and seven multiple instance learning (MIL) architectures, with and without three preprocessing approaches (original, segmented, and mask-out tiles). Performance was assessed using three-fold patient-level cross-validation, with 20% of the cohort (n = 17 of the 87 patients) held out as a final independent test set. Results: The U-Net achieved strong segmentation performance with a mean absolute error of 1.91 ± 1.31 µm, precision of 0.80 ± 0.17, and recall of 0.76 ± 0.20. Double-tier feature distillation-MIL with mask-out tiles and a fine-tuned Swin-Tiny/4 back-bone showed the highest patient-level area under the curve (AUC) of all models (AUC, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.00), while DenseNet121 had the highest patient-level accuracy (0.84). Convolutional neural network models performed more consistently than other frameworks over all preprocessing methods, while MIL architectures with domain-specific features achieved the strongest overall AUC on mask-out tiles. ViTs varied somewhat over the different preprocessing techniques with mask-out tiles achieving the highest ViT performance (Swin-Tiny/4; AUC, 0.87). Conclusions: This single-center experience demonstrates the application of deep learning to cytospin WSIs in ocular oncology, establishing a complete pipeline from tumor cell segmentation to slide-level classification. The framework provides a foundation for artificial intelligence-assisted cytopathology that could accelerate diagnosis, particularly in centers lacking specialist ocular pathology expertise, and may be adaptable to other rare cytological specimens.

Indexed as

CarcinomaChoroid NeoplasmsDeep LearningMelanomaUveal NeoplasmsBiopsy, Fine-NeedleConvolutional Neural NetworksCytodiagnosisDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple-Instance Learning AlgorithmsROC CurveUveal Melanoma

Identifiers

PMID42782244
PMCPMC13622958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.