SynthesisJournal of genetic counseling2026
The Psychosocial Impact of Receiving Whole Genome and Whole Exome Sequencing Results in Adults: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of genetic counseling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The expanding use of whole genome sequencing (WGS) and whole exome sequencing (WES) underscores the need to better understand the psychosocial impact of receiving a broader range of potential results than those generated by other types of genetic testing. This systematic review aimed to provide a comprehensive assessment of the psychosocial impact of WGS and WES testing in adult populations. An electronic literature search was conducted to identify studies published up to July 2025. Quantitative and qualitative studies involving adult population, published in English, and examining the psychosocial impact of WES and WGS test results were included in the analysis. The analysis included 45 studies (27 quantitative, 11 qualitative, 7 mixed-methods). Findings were organized into four categories: positive experiences, negative experiences, uncertainty and results sharing. Positive experiences were common, with participants reporting satisfaction from gaining greater insight into their health; negative experiences were also frequently reported, but were typically of low intensity. Feelings of uncertainty were less present among individuals who received genetic counseling. Sharing of test results was widespread, with participants demonstrating a good understanding of the implications for both themselves and others. this systematic review provides an overview of the existing literature exploring the psychosocial impact of receiving WGS and WES results in the adult population. Overall, the findings indicate that the benefits generally outweigh the potential risks of psychological distress, and that sharing of results is common. However, further qualitative and longitudinal research with larger and more diverse samples, as well as more nuanced and sensitive instruments, are needed to identify individual differences in responses that will help inform the development of appropriate models of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.