ArticleFaraday discussions2026
From reproducibility to comparability in computational photochemistry: lessons from the PhotoChem explorer prototype.
Article in Faraday discussions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present the PhotoChem Explorer (PCE) prototype, a proof-of-concept web-based platform that represents computational photochemistry studies of gas-phase molecules in a structured and queryable form. Rather than treating excited-state dynamics simulations as isolated results reported in heterogeneous formats and across different sources, PCE organizes studies according to their molecular systems, computational workflows, methodological choices, and associated observables, facilitating that relationships and trends can be explored systematically across studies. In this way, the prototype illustrates how structured data representations could support improved findability, comparison, reproducibility, and reuse in computational photochemistry. At a fundamental level, it demonstrates how excited-state dynamics studies could become part of a more connected and cumulative body of knowledge, potentially enabling new modes of investigation. The prototype exposes practical challenges that must be addressed to realize this vision, including the development of shared representations, workflow descriptions, and their integration into scientific practice. More broadly, PCE is intended as a practice-driven experimentation platform to stimulate discussion and iterative community development of standards and representations for excited-state dynamics studies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.