Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42781888›Full record

ArticleBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2026

Identification of Changes in Gene Expression.

Lucia Ameis, Kathrin Möllenhoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lucia AmeisInstitute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology (IMSB), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Kathrin MöllenhoffInstitute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology (IMSB), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7861-3892

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 427806116Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft RTG 2624
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluating the change in gene expression is a common goal in many research areas, such as in toxicological studies, which are particularly important in pre-clinical research. In practice, the analysis is often based on multiple t-tests evaluated at the observed time points of the experiment, which limits the accuracy of determining the precise time at which the gene changes in expression. If a parametric approach is chosen, the analysis is often restricted to identifying the onset of an effect, but not its length. In this paper, we propose a parametric method to identify the time frame during which the gene expression significantly changes. This is achieved by fitting a parametric model and constructing a confidence band for its first derivative. The confidence band is derived by a two-step bootstrap approach. It is summarized in terms of a hypothesis test, such that rejecting the null hypothesis means detecting a significant change in gene expression. Furthermore, a method for calculating confidence intervals for time points of interest (e.g., the beginning of significant change) is developed. We demonstrate the validity of our approach through a simulation study and present a variety of different applications to mouse gene expression data from a study investigating the effect of a Western diet on the progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Indexed as

BiometryGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationAnimalsMiceModels, Statisticalbootstrapgene expression datamodel‐based hypothesis testingpreclinical researchtime‐response models

Identifiers

PMID42781888
PMCPMC13602452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.