ArticleBMC methods2026
BLASE: bulk linkage analysis for single cell experiments - teasing out the secrets of bulk transcriptomics with trajectory analysis.
Article in BMC methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Transcriptomics has profoundly improved our knowledge of cells. The advent of single-cell transcriptomics has enabled researchers to investigate the changes which individual cells undergo, such as cell type differentiation. Bulk RNA-seq is more practical in both cost and ease, but cannot elucidate cell type specific trajectories. Deconvolution methods can estimate cell types in RNA-seq data, but there is a need for methods characterising their position on a trajectory. Methods: We present a new method called BLASE, which discretises the pseudotime of a scRNA-seq trajectory, and then uses Spearman correlation to infer the closest matching period of pseudotime to a bulk RNA-seq sample. Bootstrapping provides confidence intervals around the correlation, and subsequently informs "strong" calls. BLASE can discretise pseudotime using several different methods, provides heuristics for hyperparameter selection, and enables the visualisation of results. Results: BLASE performs correctly and outperforms other tools. In simulated scRNA-seq data it accurately identified the correct pseudotime bin for 10 pseudobulked pseudotime bins, whereas other tools we tested ranged in accuracy from around 40-90%. In experimental data, BLASE correctly mapped all pseudobulked pseudotime bins, compared to a range of around 20-75%. We tested BLASE on use cases with published single-cell and bulk transcriptomics. On 10x Visium spatial data, BLASE could resolve the spatio-temporal process of keratinocyte differentiation. When mapping a time-course of 48 hour microarray data to the Discussion: BLASE outperforms existing tools in simulated and experimental data. It can be used to a) annotate scRNA-seq data from existing RNA-seq, b) identify progress of RNA-seq data through a process captured in scRNA-seq, and c) be used to correct developmental differences in differential expression analysis. BLASE is released as an open-source R package under the GPL3 license, and is available on Bioconductor. Clinical trial: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.