ReviewSpartan medical research journal2026
Seeing Double: A Rare Encounter with a Duplicate Vas Deferens During Total Extraperitoneal Herniorrhaphy, a Case Report and Review of the Literature.
Review in Spartan medical research journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAsymptomatic anatomical anomalies are often found incidentally during unrelated surgical procedures. One rare congenital anomaly, with an incidence of approximately 0.05%, is duplication of the vas deferens within a single spermatic cord, typically identified during hernia repairs or various urological procedures. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 55-year-old male who underwent a total extraperitoneal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy for a right inguinal hernia. Intraoperatively, two vasa deferentia were identified traversing the deep inguinal ring adjacent to each other. The operation was completed with caution to preserve these structures. The patient had an uncomplicated post-operative course.
conclusionThis case underscores the importance of meticulous anatomic identification during inguinal hernia repair. Clinical awareness of such anomalies is essential for avoiding potential surgical complications, including iatrogenic damage to the vas deferens, chronic pain, hematoma, and fistula formation, during inguinal or other urological repairs. This rare case adds to the limited literature on in-surgery recognition of vas deferens duplication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.