Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42781666›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026

Prehabilitation for Pressure Ulcer Surgery: A Practical and Evidence-based Guide.

Sacha C Hauc, Jeffrey E Janis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sacha C HaucFrom the Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Jeffrey E JanisFrom the Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study is to synthesize current evidence and provide a clinically actionable framework for perioperative prehabilitation in patients undergoing pressure ulcer (PU) reconstruction. Methods: We conducted a narrative synthesis of the best available evidence, including clinical guidelines, randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and expert consensus statements relevant to perioperative optimization for PU surgery. Literature was reviewed across key domains known to influence surgical outcomes. Evidence was translated into patient-centered, clinically actionable recommendations. Results: Preoperative optimization across nutritional, mechanical, and functional domains was associated with improved wound healing and reduced postoperative complications in PU reconstruction. Nutritional supplementation with an 8-week course of vitamins A, B Conclusions: Multidisciplinary, evidence-based prehabilitation targeting modifiable risk factors improves physiological readiness and surgical outcomes in PU reconstruction. Standardized implementation of nutritional optimization, off-loading strategies, smoking cessation, and functional conditioning may reduce complications and recurrence while enhancing postoperative recovery.

Identifiers

PMID42781666
PMCPMC13600586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.