ArticleCureus2026
When Size Matters: Surgical Challenges of Giant Rectal Foreign Bodies.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rectal foreign bodies are an uncommon but increasingly recognized presentation in emergency colorectal surgery. Object size - particularly transverse diameter - and rural, low-resource settings add complexity to both diagnosis and treatment. A 57-year-old man from a rural area of southern Colombia was referred to a regional hospital for a retained lithic rectal foreign body (a stone). Plain abdominal radiography showed a cone-shaped radiopaque object. After multiple failed transanal extraction attempts, exploratory laparotomy was performed. A conical stone approximately 15 cm in diameter at its base was found, impacted between the lower rectum and the sacral promontory. Extraction was carried out through an enterotomy at the rectosigmoid junction; during the maneuver, an upper rectal laceration occurred, which was repaired with a two-layer enterorrhaphy and protected with a loop sigmoid colostomy. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged in satisfactory condition. With a basal diameter of approximately 15 cm, the object was at the upper end of the diameter range reported for rigid rectal foreign bodies requiring laparotomy. Because the pelvic outlet, rather than object length, represents the anatomical constraint to transanal extraction, the object's diameter and rigidity rendered transanal removal unfeasible. Timely escalation to laparotomy with protective diversion limited the extent of the rectal injury. Early recognition of transverse diameter, rigidity, and unfavorable morphology, together with a low threshold for surgical intervention, allows favorable outcomes even with limited infrastructure, where plain radiography and sound clinical judgment remain the mainstays of management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.